ToAnswer and Yahoo! Answers

It’s not a fair comparison at all.  First of all, ToAnswer just started, and Yahoo! Answers has been around for a long time.  But it begs the question: does the world need another quick answer site, and is the basic functionality of the new site in any way superior to the older sites, and so capable of displacing their massive user base?  Or even filling a much needed niche?

Of course, I’m a big advocate of asking librarians questions, but as you may know, a lot of people go to sites like Yahoo! Answers to get quick answers to some of their questions.  So I thought I’d do a little compare and contrast with the systems of the two sites.

First - Yahoo! Answers.

Yahoo! Answers has some interesting social aspects - you build a profile and things like that.  You look at questions people are asking, and answer the ones you think you can answer.  You can cite sources, which appeals to the librarian in me.  A lot of people who answer questions at Yahoo! Answers don’t cite their sources, but then again a lot of the questions being asked there are in the category of ‘what do you think about…’ etc.

Now, I tested ToAnswer about a week ago, and posted three questions:  What’s the best kind of bear?  What are the five platonic solids? and What’s the best Michael Moorcock book for a book club?  Later, when I was examining Yahoo! Answers, I posted the same questions.  This was my first time posting questions on the site - most of my time previously was spent answering questions.  When you answer questions on Yahoo! Answers, you get points.  When someone decides that you gave the best answer, you get bonus points.  When you ask questions, it costs points, thus creating a kind of uneasy balance.  The community helps monitor activity to make sure no one is asking inappropriate things, though the odd questions still roll through from time to time.  There’s a librarian related program that happens periodically called Slam The Boards, where librarians spend a day answering as many questions as they can on sites like Yahoo! Answers.   So.  What kind of responses did I get for my questions?

Within 30 minutes I had an answer to my Michael Moorcock question (A good one, too!).  It took about 3 hours to get an answer to my platonic solid question, but it had a link to a good math page online.  I didn’t have to ask my bear question - someone had already asked it, several times.  So instead i got to look at similar questions and their answers, which were pretty entertaining:

So, even though it takes a few steps to post a question, and you have to earn points answering questions to afford to ask very many questions, once you’ve asked it, it doesn’t take very long to find an answer, either in previously asked questions, or from Yahoo! Answers power users that love getting points for “Best Answer.”  Your question is active for a few days, after which you (the asker) are prompted to pick a best answer.  Questions are categorized, so if you want to answer questions in a limited category, it’s easy to drill down to tackle those - if you wanted to answer questions about the city you live in, for example, or about something that you have a Masters Degree in.

ToAnswer:

ToAnswer works through Twitter, allowing you to tap the collective conscious of the Twitter crowd to answer your questions.  I asked my three questions and waited.  Of my three questions, only one had any answers after six days:

So, the ease of asking the question is offset by the response to those questions, which has been disappointing.  I’m not sure where the answers came from - Twitter, or from the ToAnswer site itself - like, did Twitter users see the question in the global list and decide to answer it? Or did people coming to ToAnswer to see what it was like decide that my funny “Office” joke question was easy to answer?

I’m thinking for ToAnswer to work well, a person would have to have a lot of active followers on Twitter.  The rate the Tweets on the global timeline pass by is pretty fast, so the question could easily get lost in the shuffle pretty quickly.  But if you’re depending on your followers on Twitter to answer questions, then why bother using ToAnswer?  You could just tweet your question in the normal way and wait for a response in a familiar environment.  Any thoughts?  Twitterers out there - is ToAnswer filling a niche for you?


Email This Post to a Friend Email This Post to a Friend

Repairpal: when you need a car pal

reparipalHere’s a handy site: RepairPal. Try out this site when you want an estimate of a car repair or you can check out their auto repair encyclopedia for info about repairs. It’s super easy to use, just select your car’s make, model, year and then choose which type of car service you want to estimate. To those unfamiliar with auto repair jargon the last one can be challenging, so just bop over to the encyclopedia by clicking Expert Advice to get a basic understanding of repairs.

What I like about this site is that I now have a ballpark number to work with. My car is almost at the100k mark and might be ready for a new timing belt. RepairPal estimates the cost at $328-450 and, breaks this down between parts and labor. Nice. Even though this number may not be exactly correct, I have a sense of how much to set aside. And, if the bill is quite different from this, I’ll know to inquire about why.

RepairPal is such a pal that it even suggests shops in your zip code. Ok, maybe I’m overstating this a smidge because this feature is essentially a GoogleMaps/MapQuest mashup. But still helpful. Try it out!


Email This Post to a Friend Email This Post to a Friend

SciVee - community TV for science


SciVee is a site where scientists can upload videos that are 5- 10 minute descriptions of their peer-reviewed research papers.  Some of the really good ones synchronize the author’s oral presentation with parts of the paper, for example the charts, graphs and images.  SciVee calls these publication podcasts “Pubcasts.” I have to admit, when I first saw “pubcast,” I thought “Oh the biologists are down at the brewpub again, and decided to podcast their conversations.”  SciVee’s pubcasts are even better than that would be. Using the pubcasts would be a great way to introduce students to the research papers they describe.  SciVee pubcasts also appear to be driving more hits to their corresponding online papers, say in PLOS Biology, so it may be worth it for authors to create pubcasts when publishing new works.

Another aspect of SciVee is the contributed science videos that people can upload to the site. This includes videos of conference presentations and “postercasts” that are not peer-reviewed.  If you create an account on SciVee, you can rate add tags, and share the pubcasts and videos.  You can also embed SciVee videos on your web site.

The third component of SciVee is community and there are quite a number of communities and discussion groups started on the site. The communities don’t seem widely used - some of those with more than one or two members are the American Society of Plant Biologists (7 members), Global Warming (8)  and theWireless Sensor Network Research (also 8 members).  It will be interesting to see how this grows over time.  PLOS and NSF as well as the San Diego Supercomputer Center are partners in this venture.


Email This Post to a Friend Email This Post to a Friend

Language Learning Online

There are a whole bunch of different sites out there offering language learning online for free.  Some of these sites have social aspects, and some don’t.  I’ve tried a couple of them, but I’m not entirely sure if I like any of them, or if online language learning works for me.

See, here’s the thing.  I’d like to learn Japanese.  I like Japanese culture, manga, anime, Iron Chef, stuff like that.  Someday I’d like to travel to Japan with my family, and when I go I’d like to be able to say a few things in Japanese.  Of course, the problem with me is that I’m a procrastinator, so without a definite time by which I need to be fluent, I simply waffle.  I tried checking out a pimsleur “instant conversation” set of cassettes to play in my car, and after listening to the first tape twice while commuting, I *sigh* gave up.  I wonder if learning a new language is like dieting.

Anyway, here are four different language learning sites, and some of their particulars:

Mango Languages

After creating an account, you can select from a variety of languages to learn.  With a Discovery subscription (free, for a while) you can explore a variety of different lessons.  I selected Japanese from the list, and was taken to a slideshow-like interface.  I was also informed that with my Discovery account, I get five free ‘premium’ lessons, and I’m using one of those free premium lessons now.  Each slide has the word, phrase or conversation to be learned, written in English and in Japanese.  There is also audio, with a voice speaking the word or phrase in Japanese.  I can repeat the audio as many times as I need to before moving on to the next slide.  Periodically there are review slides that ask you what you remember.

This is an interesting site, and I’m glad they’re liberal with the number of free lessons they give, because maybe most people are like me and they are going to give up before they get very far.  There’s no social network involved in this site - you’re learning on your own.  This can be nice, but part of learning a language means using it in conversation with people, so unless you have a conversation circle at your library to take advantage of, it might be kinda lonesome.

Of particular interest to libraries is that Mango Languages offers services to libraries (for a price, I’m sure!) and gives information on how to contact them for information of that sort, if you’re interested in setting up a language learning station.

LiveMocha

When you register, there’s a simple enough form to fill out, asking you what languages you speak, and what languages you want to speak, and why.  Once you’ve completed the process, and confirmed your email and things like that, you are presented with some courses that you can take, which estimate the time it will take to master that course.  For Japanese 101, I’m looking at 50 hours.  Another 50 hours for 102, and more after that for the next courses.  Daunting, yes, but realistic, right?  LiveMocha has a social element, where you can help tutor people who are learning your language, look for tutors who know the language you are learning, or make ‘friends’ with people also on LiveMocha.

It’s hard to say from a quick look through the site how well the system works for the people involved.  Looking at the list of people who are practicing writing English, it appears that not very many are getting feedback.  There also appear to be people who are using the site for *gasp!* dating.

I don’t know if i’ll try LiveMocha’s Japanese 101, even though it’s free - 50 hours is a lot to feel like I’ve committed to.

italki

Similar to LiveMocha - sign up, confirm email, build a profile.  Instead of having an in-house lesson series like LiveMocha or Mango, italki appears to provide links to other helpful sites for learning your language of choice.  Some of these are user generate language learning wikis, which is interesting.  italki seems much more focused on the social end of things - you can search for ‘learning partners’ from around the world, or form groups so that several people can learn together.  I like the group feature - if you and some friends wanted to learn a language together, this might be a way to do it.  I’m not terribly bothered that they don’t have their own in-house lessons because they do provide a lot of links, to both text and podcast related sources.

My Happy Planet

Another social-oriented language learning site - sign up for an account and look for people to learn with/from.  There are all kinds of lessons here, including video lessons, which could be pretty neat, or annoying depending on how long it takes the videos to load.  Also, some of the videos look like they’re not exactly language learning oriented - some look like recordings of Japanese television shows, or music videos - maybe they’re to practice with once you’ve gotten more fluent.

Aside from cosmetic differences, and a few features here and there, most of these sites seem to offer the same type of learning environment, with the exception of Mango, which has no social component.  Live Mocha has a nice feel to it as far as the social aspect goes - a lot of the focus seems to be on tutoring and learning vs. building social connections.

Will I ever learn Japanese?  We’ll see - i might wait until a week before I go there, and even then it’s hard to say…


Email This Post to a Friend Email This Post to a Friend

Early SurveyMonkey results

I promised last week to post the results of the SurveyMonkey survey, so here they are, in brief -

51 respondents so far

The first question asked respondents to check boxes next to and social networks that they belong to - certainly not a comprehensive list, but containing some of the major names.  The top three sites were Facebook (79.2%), LibraryThing (60.4%) and Twitter (43.8%).  MySpace was 4th with 39.6%.

The second question asked respondents to pick one that they preferred, or as one commenter pointed out, which one they use the most.  Facebook far outpaced even the closest rivals as the preferred (or most used) of the social networks, with 65.1% of the total.  LibraryThing and Twitter were distant 2nd and 3rd, with 18.6% and 9.3%, respectively.

I included a question about age ranges, but honestly I’m not sure what to do with it.  The whole thing was part demo and part personal interest, and I thought somehow I would be able to correlate ages with preferences, but it doesn’t look like I can do that.  What I have is a nearly bell-shaped curve of respondent age, with the largest contingent being 26-33 (34%), with 46-59 in second with 28%, and 34-45 in third with 20%.

Conclusion - I probably could have included several other relevant questions to help determine other factors involved, such as income, education, and the usual.  I figure the bulk of infodoodads readers are librarians or in library and information related professions, but I could be assuming too much.  It seems that facebook is the clear ‘winner’ in the survey as the online hangout for infodoodads readers, and MySpace (the big main competitor of Facebook) doesn’t appear to hold much interest to infodoodads readers.  I’d say infodoodadders like a range of online social activities, but aren’t interested in repetition - so one large social network (facebook), one fun personal use type diversion thing (LibraryThing) and one quick communication technology (Twitter) are enough.  And really, how much more social can a person be?

I’ll leave the survey up, so if you haven’t weighed in yet, feel free to do so!


Email This Post to a Friend Email This Post to a Friend

Yahoo! I finally made a yahoo pipe!

I was super excited when I first found out about Yahoo! Pipes. I wanted to remix content on the web and build  custom feeds for different audiences.  But then I tried to use Pipes and my hopes were dashed. My initial attempts kept going awry, and I thought that eventually I would dedicate some time to learning Pipes.  Well, I didn’t.  But this week I tried again because I wanted to aggregate some blog feeds into a single feed and display it on a web page. This time I was successful.  I was also able to make an extremely simple Flickr pipe to show some river images.

I don’t think I’ve become more adept at using Pipes, but that Pipes is now a bit easier to use.  There are some powerful tools for aggregating, filtering and translating feeds in Pipes that are worth exploring and that would be great for research and course guides.  And now that I’ve had some success, I’m more likely to play around with Pipes some more.  If you’d like to get started, check out Jody Condit Fagan’s CIL 2008 presentation called “Mashups for the Nontechies: Yahoo! Pipes”  She has some homework for you there.  If you’ve had some success with Pipes, I’d like to hear about it (leave a comment?).


Email This Post to a Friend Email This Post to a Friend

Survey Monkey

Making surveys is fun, and the results can be illuminating. I tried out a survey making tool called Survey Monkey last year, but got bogged down by writing too many questions, and not clearly defining my focus before I started. This time (for this post) I went with just three questions, so I think I’m pretty safe.
Follow the link to take the survey - it took me about 15 minutes to build. I had my choice of many different types of questions, from multiple choice to text answers and in between. If you all go take the survey, I’ll post some answers next week!

Click Here to take survey

When I was writing the survey, I kept looking for a way to save it, but apparently it autosaves everything as you go. To send your survey out when you’ve finished it, click on My Surveys, and choose the “Collect” icon next to it - this will provide you with several means of providing others with a link to your survey. Pretty cool - check it out, if you haven’t already!


Email This Post to a Friend Email This Post to a Friend

searchme: bringing fun back to search

If you’re not entirely enthralled with Cuil, the new search engine that Michael just reviewed, you might give Searchme a try. What a fun search engine this is!

primarysources

Searchme presents results visually and offers visual cues to refine your search. For example, my test search on primary sources included filters for libraries, history, us government and others. I really like how the web pages of the results display and that I can use the horizontal scroll bar to quickly “page” through results. Below the visual results is another option to view the results in a text format. One neat feature is seeing my search terms highlighted in the web pages results. I want to underscore how refreshing this approach to viewing results is, it’s so much more engaging than the typical static presentation.

stacks

Another notable feature is searchme’s concept of “Stacks”. Stacks are essentially folders containing your search results. I think it’s pretty cool that I can email, view or share my stack. If I want to add a site, I can do so as well. Now that I think about it, this just might beat del.icio.us (gasp!) because honestly I sure would like some more visual cues than what del.icio.us offers when reviewing saved sites. Of course del.icio.us’ focus is different.

When you go to searchme you might be presented with a black or Night Theme instead of my preference of the light blue Day. (I get enough enough dark skies here in Oregon. ;)

For my parting shot, I will share that I was happy with the relevancy of the results I got from the several searches I tried. I didn’t feel that I needed to weed through numerous irrelevant content. If searchme didn’t do a good job with ranking results, it’d be just another startup, but with the combination of solid hits and good looks, searchme may stick around.  Good results plus a fun display means I’ll be back.


Email This Post to a Friend Email This Post to a Friend

MRQE - movie review query engine

Loretta discovered the Movie Review Query Engine (MRQE) today while crafting her brand new film studies research guide.   Students will be looking for those movie reviews before we know it.  While IMDB links out to external reviews, it always takes me a moment to locate how to do that in the slightly busy IMDB interface.  MRQE is a very pared down, easy to use site for quickly locating reviews on over 70K movies.   We use Academic Search Premier for movie reviews, as well as IMDB, but I think MRQE might be a better site to send people via chat reference, as the interface is so simple that no explanation would be needed to get review results. And MRQE links to the IMDB descriptions of movies as shown below for Raging Bull.

MRQE
Thanks for the tip, Loretta!


Email This Post to a Friend Email This Post to a Friend

cuil - search the largest web index

Unless you’ve been living under a rock, you’ve probably heard about Cuil (pronounced cool), the new mega search engine developed by former Google employees and star search engine designer Anna Patterson.

It has the familiar single-box entry, but a startling black background. Their claim to fame is an index of over 120 billion web pages, more than 3 times that of Google. I’m not entirely sure how accurate this is since Google has not published the number of pages they index for years. Either way, I’m happy to have much more available information, however, it does little good if the information is poorly matched to the search.

My stock sample search to try out search engines is to use my first and last name. I tried it with Cuil and to my surprise my staff page at my institution came up in the first page of results. I was equally surprised to notice that this result was for our old web server that has been out of use for months, so the link was dead.

Cuil has some interesting features. One that I like is a drill-down category list. Based on your search it presents you with some popular categories that expand when moused over. Results are given in 3 columns by default, I’m assuming they are in a newspaper-style reading order: top-bottom, left-right. Some results have a nice thumbnail image preview, I do like this.

Overall, I like the simple way that results are presented, the categories are interesting. However, there are a lot of mechanical problems yet. When choosing to view the next page of results I get a page that says there are no results for my search. What about the other 26,000 results I was promised? On the second try it works and my same result is on this page, but with a thumbnail from an image not found on my page. Interesting. Give it a shot!


Email This Post to a Friend Email This Post to a Friend

drop.io update

In a previous post about drop.io, I lauded the sites virtues, including the ability to fax documents out of the site for free.  I’ve gotten a few comments - here and elsewhere, that the fax services at drop.io seem to be changing, so i went to check it out.  Sadly, it’s true - free faxing is gone, at least for the time being.  Seems there was some abuse.

And I just got done laminating the “How To Use Drop.io For Faxing” sheets for patron use.


Email This Post to a Friend Email This Post to a Friend

blip.tv

Last year I was fortunate enough to go to Internet Librarian in Monterey California.  It was Halloween, so my family came along too, and we discovered via a local bartender that the place to go trick-or-treating was “Candy Cane Lane.”  It was awe-inspiring.  Thousands of trick-or-treaters, and almost every house was decorated like crazy.  That was one highlight of the conference for me - the other, more library-related one was a pre-conference workshop with David Free and David Lee King regarding podcasting and videocasting.  If you’re attending the conference this year, it appears that they’re on the program again.  It was this workshop in 2007 that started the thought process that eventually led to the One Minute Critic - my video blog of short book reviews.  So far we’re at around 140+ book reviews, and only half are me - the rest are other library staff and members of the public.

Now, on to the subject of this post:  a video hosting site (like Youtube) called blip.tv.   Blip.tv doesn’t have as big a user base as YouTube, but it does have a lot of other interesting things that I like.  For example, you can add a Creative Commons license to your videos when you upload them.  My favorite thing about blip.tv is that you can easily cross-upload and cross-post your video as part of your initial upload.  In case that sounds like I’m speaking a different language, let me explain.  When you upload a video to a site that hosts videos, like Youtube or Blip.tv, it takes a little bit of time - anywhere from a minute on up to five or ten minutes, even on a fast connection (it all depends on the size of your file).  Once you have it there, you can manually cross post the video in a variety of ways, either linking to or embedding the video in different places.  If you have to do this manually, for every video, it can take up more time going to each site and performing the functions needed to do that.  At blip.tv, you can set things up so that whenever you upload a video, that video is simultaneously uploaded to other locations, and posted about in still more locations, thus saving a bunch of time.

As you can see, I can send the video to my video blog, tag it in del.icio.us, send a tweet, send a MySpace Bulletin, a Facebook Action, and cross-upload to the Internet Archive.  These are just the things that I picked, but there’s a big long list of other options.  The one drawback is that you can’t cross-upload to YouTube, so i still have to upload the video twice every time i want to put it online - once for blip.tv and once to YouTube - YouTube is the most used video sharing site out there, so I’m going to put the videos there (also, the YouTube player seemed to work better when embedded in our library website).  If you’d like, you can also view my account on blip.tv - if you want to compare the look and feel of blip vs. youtube, for example.


Email This Post to a Friend Email This Post to a Friend