It’s not a fair comparison at all. First of all, ToAnswer just started, and Yahoo! Answers has been around for a long time. But it begs the question: does the world need another quick answer site, and is the basic functionality of the new site in any way superior to the older sites, and so capable of displacing their massive user base? Or even filling a much needed niche?
Of course, I’m a big advocate of asking librarians questions, but as you may know, a lot of people go to sites like Yahoo! Answers to get quick answers to some of their questions. So I thought I’d do a little compare and contrast with the systems of the two sites.
First - Yahoo! Answers.
Yahoo! Answers has some interesting social aspects - you build a profile and things like that. You look at questions people are asking, and answer the ones you think you can answer. You can cite sources, which appeals to the librarian in me. A lot of people who answer questions at Yahoo! Answers don’t cite their sources, but then again a lot of the questions being asked there are in the category of ‘what do you think about…’ etc.
Now, I tested ToAnswer about a week ago, and posted three questions: What’s the best kind of bear? What are the five platonic solids? and What’s the best Michael Moorcock book for a book club? Later, when I was examining Yahoo! Answers, I posted the same questions. This was my first time posting questions on the site - most of my time previously was spent answering questions. When you answer questions on Yahoo! Answers, you get points. When someone decides that you gave the best answer, you get bonus points. When you ask questions, it costs points, thus creating a kind of uneasy balance. The community helps monitor activity to make sure no one is asking inappropriate things, though the odd questions still roll through from time to time. There’s a librarian related program that happens periodically called Slam The Boards, where librarians spend a day answering as many questions as they can on sites like Yahoo! Answers. So. What kind of responses did I get for my questions?
Within 30 minutes I had an answer to my Michael Moorcock question (A good one, too!). It took about 3 hours to get an answer to my platonic solid question, but it had a link to a good math page online. I didn’t have to ask my bear question - someone had already asked it, several times. So instead i got to look at similar questions and their answers, which were pretty entertaining:


So, even though it takes a few steps to post a question, and you have to earn points answering questions to afford to ask very many questions, once you’ve asked it, it doesn’t take very long to find an answer, either in previously asked questions, or from Yahoo! Answers power users that love getting points for “Best Answer.” Your question is active for a few days, after which you (the asker) are prompted to pick a best answer. Questions are categorized, so if you want to answer questions in a limited category, it’s easy to drill down to tackle those - if you wanted to answer questions about the city you live in, for example, or about something that you have a Masters Degree in.
ToAnswer:
ToAnswer works through Twitter, allowing you to tap the collective conscious of the Twitter crowd to answer your questions. I asked my three questions and waited. Of my three questions, only one had any answers after six days:


So, the ease of asking the question is offset by the response to those questions, which has been disappointing. I’m not sure where the answers came from - Twitter, or from the ToAnswer site itself - like, did Twitter users see the question in the global list and decide to answer it? Or did people coming to ToAnswer to see what it was like decide that my funny “Office” joke question was easy to answer?
I’m thinking for ToAnswer to work well, a person would have to have a lot of active followers on Twitter. The rate the Tweets on the global timeline pass by is pretty fast, so the question could easily get lost in the shuffle pretty quickly. But if you’re depending on your followers on Twitter to answer questions, then why bother using ToAnswer? You could just tweet your question in the normal way and wait for a response in a familiar environment. Any thoughts? Twitterers out there - is ToAnswer filling a niche for you?
Email This Post to a Friend









Overall, I like the simple way that results are presented, the categories are interesting. However, there are a lot of mechanical problems yet. When choosing to view the next page of results I get a page that says there are no results for my search. What about the other 26,000 results I was promised? On the second try it works and my same result is on this page, but with a thumbnail from an image not found on my page. Interesting. Give it a shot!

Latest Comments